This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilize.

Update (10/26/2018): This article incorrectly states that the RTX 2070 would debut at a $600 launch price — essentially higher up its communicated MSRP. This did not occur. Nosotros have reevaluated the RTX 2070 at the correct $500 price indicate. The new article and analysis should exist assumed to have primacy over this one.

Reviews of Nvidia's RTX 2070 are out, and the card's overall positioning and operation aren't going to be much help for Nvidia's RTX family. As we discussed final calendar week in our massive RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti review, there are a number of economic and technological realities that piece of work against the quick adoption of whatsoever GPU technology. Nvidia has exacerbated this with its huge toll increases, and the RTX 2070 continues both these trends.

Ostensibly, the 2070 should be a $500 office, simply reviewers are flatly telling readers not to expect any cards in-marketplace for that cost whatsoever time soon. Instead, these GPUs volition launch at $600 and above, which means they've effectively left the GTX 1080 backside and are bidding to challenge the GTX 1080 Ti. And as of today, you can buy a GTX 1080SEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce for $434 on Newegg, which means the 2070 needs to demonstrate some significant performance gains to match information technology. With a base of operations cost of $600, we're looking for the RTX 2070 to offer at least 1.38x more performance than the GTX 1080 to be a decent buy.

The nautical chart — non to mention reviews — ostend this isn't something the RTX 2070SEEAMAZON_ET_135 See Amazon ET commerce can really do. Anandtech delivers the nasty news in a single paragraph.

Going back to the numbers, the RTX 2070 Founders Edition TDP and boost clock tweaks only amount to around a four% proceeds over the reference 2070 at 4K. The difference is not much in the grand scheme of things, but the setup makes more than sense when looking at the GTX 1080 competition. The reference RTX 2070 is faster than the GTX 1080 at 4K and 1440p past only effectually x%, a gap that is easily airtight past factory-overclocked custom cards.

The comparing doesn't get whatsoever improve if we check relative generation-to-generation upgrades for the x70 family unit. Anand points out that while the GTX 1070 delivered a one.57x increase in 1440p functioning relative to the GTX 970, the GTX 2070 can only manage a i.36x increase over the GTX 1070. Now, watch the math. Nosotros'll use the college-priced Atomic number 26 cards to brand the comparison await improve for Nvidia.

GTX 970 launch price: $329
GTX 1070 launch price: $449
GTX 2070 launch price: $600

In 2022, you could buy a 1.57x increment in functioning for a ane.36x increase in cost. Today, you can purchase a 1.36x increase in functioning for a 1.33x increase in price relative to the launch price of the GTX 1070. Except, of course, the GTX 1070 isn't a launch carte anymore. It currently sells for $339 — which ways the actual price/performance ratio for this comparison is a i.76x increase in price for a ane.36x increase in functioning.

This is not compelling. It will never exist compelling.

The RTX 2070 Is a Unsafe Card to Purchase for Adjacent-Gen Feature Support

The problem with the RTX 2070 is that Nvidia has put a premium price tag on it without get-go demonstrating that the GPU volition actually be capable of handling whatsoever side by side-generation features. This is not an incidental point. At Nvidia'south launch result for the RTX family unit, it was widely observed that games with ray tracing enabled like Battlefield 5 were running "around" 60fps, only multiple reviewers noted they did not think the frame rate was steady.

Information technology would be inappropriate to treat this data point every bit the final give-and-take on RTX functioning, only we can brand some reasonable assumptions based on it. First, let's presume that improve drivers and game support, plus some fine-tuning of the effect itself, volition meliorate performance sufficiently for an RTX 2080 to run the aforementioned scene at 60fps rather than an RTX 2080 Ti. Nvidia'south "RTX-Ops" is a meaningless number, but since it's the meaningless number nosotros've got, we know that the RTX 2080 Ti is capable of 76 trillion "RTX-Ops" while the RTX 2080 is capable of 57 trillion. That'southward a ane.33x operation advantage for the 2080 Ti, and so when we say nosotros're assuming the RTX 2080 can take over the job, nosotros're assuming Nvidia had a lot of optimization work it could still perform.

Simply even this generous assumption leaves the RTX 2070 falling flat. It has just 78 per centum the ray tracing performance of the RTX 2080, which means gamers can look forrad to bumping along at ~47fps in 1080p with their brand-new $600 video card. As I talk over in our review of the RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Ti, history overwhelmingly indicates that taking a bet on a adjacent-gen feature past trying to buy in at a depression level rarely works. If you don't believe me, ask an 8800 GTS owner if they were happy to come across the GPUs they bought for $400 in 2006 blown out of the water past a $300 card barely a yr later.

When it comes to GPUs, math rarely lies. There's always the possibility for hidden snares and bottlenecks, but if the RTX 2070 has 55 percent the RTX functioning of the 2080 Ti, it's safe to presume it will likely offer between 45 and 65 percentage of the performance of the RTX 2080 Ti. But right now, the only data point we take on that card is that running BFV, the $ane,200 RTX 2080 Ti struggled to maintain a 60fps frame charge per unit. Nosotros presume Nvidia and Dice volition better on these figures. It's possible they won't. If they tin can't, an RTX 2070 might terminate up pulling a 30fps frame rate in BFV @ 1080p with ray tracing enabled. That's not a reasonable achievement for a $600 GPU.

I've made information technology clear that I don't call back gamers should buy Turing GPUs. The toll increases aren't remotely justified by available operation and the future value of ray tracing and DLSS is a complete unknown. But I will say this: The more than you lot care well-nigh ray tracing and functioning in that mode, the leerier you should exist of buying an RTX 2070. If you dubiety this, do yourself a favor, and go look at reviews of early DirectX 10 and even some DX11 GPUs, like the HD 5770. It's mutual for midrange cards to struggle in new APIs. And ray tracing, equally Nvidia has noted, is far more than just an API change — it requires all-encompassing silicon support, specialized hardware, and capabilities that are merely now in their infancy.

If you actually care about future performance, wait. Don't purchase the sizzle. Don't buy the thought that Nvidia wouldn't ship a GPU with technical ray tracing ability that couldn't practically be used for ray tracing. It's entirely possible that games volition offer different levels of ray tracing to target unlike GPUs, but since we don't know if that'll happen yet or how good it volition await if information technology does. The RTX 2070 might end up delivering rather uninspiring support levels while the jaw-dropping furnishings in Battlefield V require a GPU $200 – $600 more expensive.

The paradox of Turing is that Nvidia might be absolutely correct in its efforts to push the game manufacture to prefer ray tracing. It may be that, 10 years from at present, we'll all be kicking back in games that either solely use ray tracing or that deploy it extensively alongside rasterization for a all-time-of-both-worlds gaming experience. I am not, in any style, trashing the idea that ray tracing could be an exciting time to come technology for games.

But that doesn't mean Turing is going to deliver information technology. And it's very hard to recommend a GPU that offers but a small-scale performance improvement over the concluding generation with no guarantee that it's fast enough when running next-generation features to actually be able to utilise them. A number of sites accept written reviews of the RTX 2070 — [H]ardOCP has their own coverage up equally well, which you can read here.

At present Read: RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti Review: You Tin't Polish a Turing, Nvidia Will Keep Pascal GPUs on Store Shelves Later RTX Launches, and Don't Buy the Ray-Traced Hype Around the Nvidia RTX 2080